« Denisova et al. on who wants to revisit privatization in formerly Communist countries. | Main | Putnam and Shapiro on whether treaties make citizens more likely to punish human rights violations »

Mutz on the political consequences of 'in your face' television

Abstract: How do Americans acquire the impression that their political foes have some understandable basis for their views, and thus represent a legitimate opposition? How do they come to believe that reasonable people may disagree on any given political controversy? Given that few people talk regularly to those of opposing perspectives, some theorize that mass media, and television in particular, serve as an important source of exposure to the rationales for oppositional views. A series of experimental studies suggests that television does, indeed, have the capacity to encourage greater awareness of oppositional perspectives. However, common characteristics of televised political discourse—–incivility and close-up camera perspectives—–cause audiences to view oppositional perspectives as less legitimate than they would have otherwise. I discuss the broader implications of these findings for assessments of the impact of television on the political process, and for the perspective that televised political discourse provides on oppositional political views.

Available here.

Diane C. Mutz, “Effects of “In-Your-Face” Television Discourse on Perceptions of a Legitimate Opposition,” American Political Science Review 101:4, 521-635.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)