May 12, 2003

Debasing the currency

One of the things that really makes me angry is the debasement of language by political spin. Prime example - the term "class warfare." This Washington Post article talks about how the administration has managed to cow the Democrats, by calling their efforts to criticise government tax policy "class warfare." That isn't class warfare. Class warfare is when the administration brings in tax cuts that grossly and disproportionately favour the richest 1%. Class warfare is when the federal government oversees swingeing cuts in state level programs supposed to help the poor. The current US administration seems to be auditioning for the part of lackey of monopoly capital in some 60's Marxist agit-prop drama. Its policies are that crudely biased. And nobody in the mainstream of the Democratic Party is calling them on it.

Update: Douglas Kellner has a similar reaction, as does Eugene Oregon

And see Jack Balkin (permalinks bloggered) for an excellent long essay on Republican hardball tactics and Democrat spinelessness. Josh Marshall sums up the latter perfectly when he says " At a certain point you wonder whether the GOP will have to start executing family pets before the Dems find something they can mobilize on."

Posted by Henry at May 12, 2003 11:52 PM | TrackBack
Comments

But I thought “class war” was a good thing? Or so William Kristol said in the pages of the Weekly Standard not so long ago, where he cheerfully admitted that conservatives were on the side of the barons and drawing the bridge up against the peasants.

Posted by: drapetomaniac at May 14, 2003 03:32 AM

Oh, and to add, fwiw, I’m on PC/IE5 and the text in the Comments popup is really hard to read. There is almost no vertical separation between the lines so they crash into each other.

Posted by: drapetomaniac at May 14, 2003 03:34 AM

Hi Drapetomaniac

Have fixed the display issue in CSS - it should now be much more readable. That Kristol piece sounds interesting - is it available on the WWW, or have you blogged it on your own site?

Posted by: Henry at May 14, 2003 12:30 PM

It is more readable, thanks. Don’t see the original article online but it’s quoted in a review of Michael Lind’s Up from Conservatism.

Posted by: drapetomaniac at May 15, 2003 07:21 AM

sorry, didn’t realize you’d turned off html. the review is here:
http://query.nytimes.com/search/full-page?res=9C04EFD8143FF937A3575BC0A960958260

Posted by: drapetomaniac at May 15, 2003 12:14 PM

Thanks: it’s an interesting review.

Posted by: Henry at May 15, 2003 07:53 PM

Ok

Posted by: Michael at October 21, 2003 06:54 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?