<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Michael Kaiser&apos;s weblog</title>
      <link>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2007</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 11:53:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.2</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Google Library Project on Arts and Letters</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Today on <a href="http://www.aldaily.com"> Arts and Letters </a> was an article about the <a href="http://books.google.com"> Google Library Project </a>, which has been a topic of class discussion.  The article, called <a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=14431&amp;R=11621278FA"> Google and Its Enemies: The much-hyped project to digitize 32 million books sounds like a good idea. Why are so many people taking shots at it? </a>, gives an excellent break down/ summary of the major issues involved in the project.  Behind this entry are a few of my favorite quotes&#8230; </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/12/google_library_project_on_arts.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/12/google_library_project_on_arts.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 11:53:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Another Presentation</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I found another presentation online, this time on the website of the <a href=”http://ndia.org”> National Defense Industrial Association </a>.  It was given by the commander of the 8th Air Force, which is one of the units most heavily involved in AF Cyber Command.  The briefing can be found <a href=” http://proceedings.ndia.org/7030/Elder.pdf”>here</a>.  He keeps the new mantra of the Air Force: “To deliver sovereign options for the defense of the United States of America and its global interests –to fly and fight in air, space, and cyberspace.”  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/12/another_presentation.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/12/another_presentation.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 15:47:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Amazing what you can find on the internet</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I found a PowerPoint presentation given by Dr. Lani Kass, director of the AF Cyber Task Force in the Pentagon in September 2006, just after the creation of <span class="caps">AFCYBER </span>was announced.  Unfortunately, I lost the location of the file and inexplicably was unable to find it again after some searching through my history.  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/11/amazing_what_you_can_kind_on_t.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/11/amazing_what_you_can_kind_on_t.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:19:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Patriot-Hackers Needed</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Wanted:  Independently wealthy, top tier computer science graduate with hacking experience.  Must be able to receive a high-level security clearance (no bitTorrent, folks), be comfortable interacting with military personnel, sign a long-term commitment and work long hours for little pay.  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/11/patriothackers_needed.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/11/patriothackers_needed.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:49:32 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Air Force Cyber Command Revisited</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In late 2006, Secretary of the Air Force Michael Wynne announced the creation of Air force Cyberspace Command (AFCYBER) to be stood up in the summer of 2007.  There were a number of articles on the announcement.  Here’s a quote from one on <a href=”http://fcw.com”>Federal Computer Week’s website</a>: </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/11/air_force_cyber_command_revisi.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/11/air_force_cyber_command_revisi.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:23:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Estonia Cyberwar</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I was watching Live Free or Die Hard, the newest Die Hard movie, the other night.  In it, an unnamed, unexplained group of French speaking Americans (apparently) engage in a cyberattack on Washington DC and the infrastructure of the North East.  The details aren’t important, but there are a few items that are.  First, cyberpower and cybersecurity like what I have been talking about over the course of this semester’s blog posts has made its way into popular culture.  Second, it made me think of Estonia.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/11/the_estonia_cyberwar.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/11/the_estonia_cyberwar.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:31:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Air Force Cyber Command - Offensive Branch of US Cyberpower?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this year, the Air Force made a move to take over responsibility for military operations in cyberspace, in a bold move in the typical game of inter-service rivalry.  In a <a href=”http://integrator.hanscom.af.mil/2007/March/03292007/03292007-17.htm”> press release </a>, General Mike Moseley, <span class="caps">AFCC, </span>announced the creation of Air Force Cyber Command. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/11/air_force_cyber_command_offens.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/11/air_force_cyber_command_offens.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:05:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Quick Note - Russia&apos;s &quot;Soft&quot; Cyberpower</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/27/AR2007102701384.html?nav=rss_email/components">article in the Washington Post</a> today about the Russian government bolstering the influence of state-sponsored websites got me thinking about whether or not I am going to include this sort of thing in my paper on Cyberpower.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/10/quick_note_russias_soft_cyberp.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/10/quick_note_russias_soft_cyberp.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:51:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Deutsche Telekom und Net Neutrality</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting post from the <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/25/deutsche-telecom-prepares-for-two-tier-internet/index.html?ex=1350964800&amp;en=7c676681527f89e8&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">NY Times &#8220;Bits&#8221; blog </a> about net neutrality.  Apparently, the future is now.  The text of the entry (its not very long), is pasted below.  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/10/deutsche_telekom_und_net_neutr.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/10/deutsche_telekom_und_net_neutr.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:44:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>DHS and Cyberpower</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the next few entries, I am going to examine how various US government agencies address the issue of cyberpower, starting with <span class="caps">DHS. </span> In <a href="http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/lausten/2007/10/cyber_security_and_the_nationa.html">Eric Lausten’s blog</a>, he breaks down the <a href=” http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/homeland/nshs/NSHS.pdf”> National Strategy for Homeland Security </a> which was issued earlier this month.  This topic is closely reverent to my paper as well as Eric’s.  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/10/dhs_and_cyberpower_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/10/dhs_and_cyberpower_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:57:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Cyberpower: Breaking Down the Threat</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I wrote about the reasons cyberpower is needed as an instrument of national strategy.  As part of that analysis, I briefly touched on vulnerabilities and asymmetric threats posed by actors in cyberspace.  This week, I focus on the threats, breaking them down into a few different categories and providing further structure for the question that I will be answering in my paper.  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/10/cyberpower_breaking_down_the_t_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/10/cyberpower_breaking_down_the_t_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:49:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Why Cyberpower?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[A paper about power in cyberspace must start by answering two fundamental questions.  I wrote about the first was answered last week, that is, the boundaries of cyberspace.  This week, I will answer the next – why is cyberpower needed?  The answer to this question is threefold, with key lessons easily drawn from the other kinds of national power projection whether it be by land, sea, air or space.  Cyberpower is a necessary requirement of the United States because of the importance of the Internet to US economic, social and political life, the vulnerabilities inherent in the US system, and the asymmetric capabilities of US adversaries when it comes to cyberspace operations.<p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/10/why_cyberpower.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/10/why_cyberpower.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:52:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Boundaries of Cyberpower</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Any fully developed concept of cyberpower requires a firm definition of the boundaries of cyberspace.  While this issue might seem simple on first glance, it is actually a lot deeper than one might expect&#8230;</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/10/boundaries_of_cyberpower.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/10/boundaries_of_cyberpower.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:56:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Net neutrality and national interest</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Flag follows trade – the concept that the state will extend its reach into any environment in which commerce is taking place.  The debate about net neutrality has direct relevance to this idea and some interesting implications for the future of cyberspace.  Will the arms of national power pursue American corporations as they extend their reach, through cyberspace, into other counties?  What forms of national power will they (or can they) use?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/09/net_neutrality_and_national_in.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/09/net_neutrality_and_national_in.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:21:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Interesting Article About Gatekeeping</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I was connected to this article from <a href="http://www.aldaily.com"> Arts and Letters Daily. </a>  It has some relevance to our gatekeeping topic for this week, related to social networking sites and societal norms.   The article is <a href="http://www.thenewatlantis.com/archive/17/rosen.htm">&#8220;Virtual Friendship and the New Narcissism&#8221;</a> by Christine Rosen.</p>

<p>Below is an excerpt:</p>

<blockquote>Also, in the offline world, communities typically are responsible for enforcing norms of privacy and general etiquette. In the online world, which is unfettered by the boundaries of real-world communities, new etiquette challenges abound. For example, what do you do with a “friend” who posts inappropriate comments on your Wall? What recourse do you have if someone posts an embarrassing picture of you on his MySpace page? What happens when a friend breaks up with someone—do you defriend the ex? If someone “friends” you and you don’t accept the overture, how serious a rejection is it? Some of these scenarios can be resolved with split-second snap judgments; others can provoke days of agonizing. </blockquote>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/09/interesting_article_about_gate.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henryfarrell.net/internet/kaiser/2007/09/interesting_article_about_gate.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:35:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
